Editorial Method
How This Directory Was Built
The source hierarchy, inclusion rules, reconciliation process and limits behind every record.
A reproducible editorial process
A licence name alone is not publishable evidence
- Join the national association's Japanese and English entries through stable detail pages.
- Extract Kagoshima, Miyazaki, Kuma, Iki and Okinawa official directories, then reconcile names, addresses and official URLs.
- Add regional-only records while excluding operators whose listing contains sake evidence only.
- Add an NTA single-distilled licence candidate only when an official site names a current product and links it to the producer or site.
- Fix prefectures north to south and share the same record IDs and order across all languages.
Evidence statuses
National + regional appears in both layers. National association and regional association identify a single official-directory layer. Official product supplement was added through producer-managed current product evidence.
Checked 2026-07-27. Current edition: 455 records. We audited 8 blank-label records; 2 remain explicitly marked as not named by their official source. 14 commercial licence candidates without named-product evidence remain in the audit CSV and outside the public directory.
