Bacchus
LINE

Bruno Paillard

Same Blend, Different Time: Understanding Bruno Paillard’s Cuvée 72

Editorial landscape of Champagne with Reims Cathedral, vineyards and reflections symbolizing time

Champagne is typically understood through the prism of grape varieties, terroir, or harvest years. Yet a compelling question arises when those environmental variables are held completely constant: what happens when time alone is varied?

Bruno Paillard’s “Cuvée 72” was created to answer precisely that. Its architectural foundation is identical to the house benchmark, “Première Cuvée Extra-Brut.” Both share the exact composition—45% Pinot Noir, 33% Chardonnay, and 22% Pinot Meunier—and both are crafted as multi-vintage blends incorporating reserve wines across multiple harvests. Each is finished in an Extra-Brut style with a restrained dosage.

The defining distinction lies not in the vineyard or the press, but in the time granted to the wine after disgorgement.

The Arithmetic of Time: 36 Plus 36

Traditional Champagne secondary fermentation takes place in the bottle, followed by an extended period resting on spent yeast cells—aging “on the lees.” In time, these lees are collected in the neck of the bottle and removed during disgorgement.

Première Cuvée Extra-Brut rests for three years on the lees, followed by a minimum of six months of post-disgorgement maturation before release. Cuvée 72, by contrast, undergoes 36 months on the lees and then rests for an additional 36 months in the cellars post-disgorgement. Thirty-six months plus another thirty-six: seventy-two months in total.

The numeral “72” is neither a vintage designation nor an arbitrary serial code. It is an exact measurement of patience.

Post-Disgorgement Maturation as a Design Choice

Cuvée 72 blends wine from the most recent harvest with a perpetual reserve system dating back to 1985, drawing on more than 30 wines, some barrel-fermented in oak. In terms of origin and assemblage, its blueprint mirrors Première Cuvée Extra-Brut.

Where Cuvée 72 departs is in extending post-disgorgement resting time from six months to a minimum of three years. Rather than creating distinction through sweetness or altered grape ratios, time itself becomes the deliberate variable.

As the house observes, extended resting after disgorgement causes the fruit-led aroma to change over time. Time here is not an afterthought; it is an active ingredient in the structural design of the Champagne.

A Matter of Evolution, Not Hierarchy

This deliberate aging does not establish a hierarchy of quality, nor does it imply that longer maturation is inherently superior.

Première Cuvée Extra-Brut presents the house style in its vibrant, balanced youth after six months of post-disgorgement rest. Cuvée 72 captures that identical core at a far later stage of its narrative arc. They represent two distinct chapters of the same story rather than a competition between tiers.

To appreciate Cuvée 72 requires stepping away from rarity or critical point scores. It asks us to look beyond what is inside the bottle and consider a fundamental question: at what stage of its journey, and for how long, was the wine permitted to rest?

The Disgorgement Date as a Living Record

Since 1983, Bruno Paillard has printed the exact disgorgement date on every back label. Disgorgement is not merely an operational step; it marks the precise moment when autolysis ends and bottle evolution begins.

For a multi-vintage Champagne, a harvest date alone cannot convey the full history of maturation. Knowing when the wine was disgorged and how long it subsequently rested transforms the label into an authentic record of time.

A Deeper Narrative for Bangkok’s Glass

In Bangkok’s fine dining and hospitality culture, reliance on ratings can easily flatten complex wines into simple rankings. Cuvée 72 invites a more thoughtful conversation.

With identical grape ratios, identical dosage, and the same reserve system, the contrast between these two cuvées demonstrates how post-disgorgement rest alters texture, tension, and aromatic complexity. The number “72” is not a claim of superiority, but a quiet testament to process.

Cuvée 72 serves as a reminder that a Champagne’s character is shaped by more than soil and climate. The moment the lees are removed, and the silence granted to the bottle thereafter, are decisions crafted by the human hand. Time, too, is a choice.


This article is intended solely to explore the winemaking artistry and cultural heritage of Maison Bruno Paillard and Cuvée 72, and does not aim to promote or encourage the consumption of alcohol.

บทความนี้จัดทำขึ้นเพื่อนำเสนอข้อมูลเกี่ยวกับศิลปะการทำไวน์และมรดกทางวัฒนธรรมของ Maison Bruno Paillard และ Cuvée 72 เท่านั้น มิได้มีเจตนาเพื่อส่งเสริมหรือโฆษณาเครื่องดื่มแอลกอฮอล์ สำหรับผู้มีอายุ 20 ปีขึ้นไป โปรดดื่มอย่างรับผิดชอบ

Discover the culture behind every bottle

We share brewery stories, tasting notes and the craft of koji & fermentation — for educational and cultural purposes only.

เราถ่ายทอดเรื่องราวจากผู้ผลิต บันทึกรสชาติ และศาสตร์แห่งโคจิและการหมัก — เพื่อการศึกษาและวัฒนธรรมเท่านั้น

Follow on Instagram Facebook